Institutional Repository of Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, CAS
国内心理健康类APP的可用性研究 | |
其他题名 | Research on Usability of Domestic Mental Health APP |
李商1,3,4; 史文静1,5; 王静1; 邓超琼1; 廖铭璐2; 张雪琴1,2 | |
第一作者 | 李商 |
心理所单位排序 | 1 |
摘要 | 目的对国内四款心理健康类APP进行可用性测试,评估其可用性水平并提供科学的改进方案。方法根据国内的心理健康类APP的市场分析,筛选出四个研究样本:壹心理、简单心理、比优心理和松果倾诉。对研究样本进行功能分析后,确定四个功能的测试任务:心理教育、心理测量、心理问答和心理咨询。本研究结合绩效测试、有声思维、和问卷调查的方法,选取31名被试,在效率、有效性和满意度三个指标上评估四个APP的可用性水平并分析优势和不足。结果结合主客观指标,心理教育中,壹心理表现最优;心理测量和心理问答中,壹心理和简单心理显著优于其他APP;心理咨询中,四款APP的客观指标差异不显著,主观指标中松果倾诉的评价最低。在总体主观评价中,壹心理和简单心理的评分显著高于松果倾诉和比优心理。结论壹心理和简单心理的可用性水平明显高于松果倾诉和比优心理。壹心理和简单心理的可用性优势表现在:搜索功能强大、首页功能分区明显、咨询师信息专业且易筛选。 |
其他摘要 | Objective In the present study, we tested the usability of four mental health APPs in China, to evaluate their usability level and to provide a scientific improvement scheme. Methods According to the market analysis of mental health APPs in China, four research samples were selected: Yixinli, Jiandanxinli, Biyouxinli, and Songguoqingsu. After the functional analysis of the research samples, the test tasks of four functions are determined: mental health education, self-assessment of mental health status, question and answer (Q&A), and counseling services. In the usability test of this paper, combined with the methods of questionnaire, thinking aloud and performance measurement, 31 subjects were selected to evaluate the usability level of the four APPs and analyze their usability problems on the three indicators of efficiency, effectiveness, and satisfaction. Results Combining objective and subjective indexes, the performance of Yixinli was the best in mental health education; in self-assessment of mental health status and Q&A, Yixinli and Jiandanxinli were significantly better than the others; with regards to counseling services, there was no significant difference in the objective indexes of the four APP, but in the subjective index, the evaluation of Songguoqingsu was the lowest. In the overall subjective evaluation, the scores of Yixinli and Jiandanxinli were significantly higher than those of Biyouxinli and Songguoqingsu. Conclusion The usability level of Yixinli and Jiandanxinli is significantly higher than that of Biyouxinli and Songguoqingsu. The usability advantages of Yixinli and Jiandanxinli are powerful search function, obvious homepage function partition, professional consultant information, and easy screening. |
关键词 | 心理健康类APP 可用性 用户测试 交互设计 |
2020 | |
语种 | 中文 |
发表期刊 | 包装工程 |
ISSN | 1001-3563 |
页码 | 21 |
期刊论文类型 | 实证研究 |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/33363 |
专题 | 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室 |
作者单位 | 1.中国科学院行为科学重点实验室中国科学院心理研究所 2.广州医科大学应用心理系 3.中国科学院大学心理学系 4.华南师范大学心理学院 5.广州医科大学附属脑科医院 |
第一作者单位 | 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 李商,史文静,王静,等. 国内心理健康类APP的可用性研究[J]. 包装工程,2020:21. |
APA | 李商,史文静,王静,邓超琼,廖铭璐,&张雪琴.(2020).国内心理健康类APP的可用性研究.包装工程,21. |
MLA | 李商,et al."国内心理健康类APP的可用性研究".包装工程 (2020):21. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 文献类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
国内心理健康类APP的可用性研究.pdf(1158KB) | 期刊论文 | 出版稿 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 请求全文 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
查看访问统计 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[李商]的文章 |
[史文静]的文章 |
[王静]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[李商]的文章 |
[史文静]的文章 |
[王静]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[李商]的文章 |
[史文静]的文章 |
[王静]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论