PSYCH OpenIR  > 健康与遗传心理学研究室
职业压力源量表的编制及初步应用
其他题名The development and preliminary application of Occupational Stressors Scale
王君
导师陈天勇
2021-12
摘要伴随经济发展与转型,我国当前在职人员面临更高、更复杂的工作要求,职业压力水平日益增高。职业压力引发的身心健康问题日益增加,甚至引发严重的社会问题,得到越来越多关注。我国近年来通过引进国外成熟量表和尝试组织开发量表,在职业压力测量方面取得一定进展,然而同样也面临一定问题。本文研究分成两部分:(1)广泛查阅国内外关于职业压力相关理论及测量工具的文献,结合深度访谈和专家评定,确定量表维度和条目,形成初始量表。采用网络问卷形式2批次抽取635名在职人员为研究对象,样本1(n = 295)用于初始量表预测试,样本2(n = 340)用于正式量表施测,并将有效样本数据用于信度、效度检验分析。(2)采用网络问卷的形式选取427名在职人员进行职业压力、抑郁、至性功能障碍以及正念特质的自评测量,探索人口统计学特征下职业压力得分差异比较,职业压力对于心理健康的作用,以及探索特质正念对于职业压力与心理健康间的调节效样。研究结果如下:(1)研究一:整合职业压力相关理论及成熟应用的测量工具并结合我国当前经济社会环境和职业场景,开展职业压力源量表的维度、条目的筛选确定。量表基于要求与能力自主性、付出与回报、组织氛围的三因子结构,经过内部一致性检验、验证性因子分析、重测信度检验等结果提示信效度良好。(2)研究二:不同性别的人群在职业压力源量表付出与回报维度的得分具有显著差异,女性在此维度的压力普遍高于男性;不同年龄的人群在付出与回报、组织氛围以及职业压力总分的得分存在显著差异,26~35岁人群的职业压力高于其他年龄段人群;不同婚姻状态的人群在付出与回报、组织氛围和职业压力总分的得分存在显著差异,已婚人群来自付出与回报维度显著高于未婚人群;不同文化程度人群在职业压力总分及各维度得分均存在显著差异,本科学历人群在付出与回报维度得分高于其他学历人群,研究生学历及以上人群面临来自要求与能力与自主性的压力更大;不同月收入及岗位级别的人群在付出与回报维度得分存在显著差异,月收入越高、岗位级别越高则面临更低的付出与回报失衡引发的压力。基于上述研究结果得出以下结论:基于要求与能力自主性、付出与回报、组织氛围三因子结构的职业压力源量表可以作为新经济时代背景下我国在职人群(尤其是脑力劳动者)的职业压力评估工具。职业压力得分与心理健康(抑郁、执行功能失常)得分具有两两正相关关系,职业压力及各维度均可以对心理健康问题具有良好的预测效果。正念接纳维度对于职业压力与抑郁间存在显著的调节效应,特质正念(尤其是正念-接纳)偏低的人群的情绪健康(抑郁)更容易受到职业压力的影响。
其他摘要With the development and transformation of the economy, China’s employees are facing higher and more complex work demands, and the level of occupational stress is increasing day by day. The physical and mental health problems caused by occupational stress are increasing, and even serious social problems are caused, which have attracted more and more attention. In recent years, China has made certain progress in occupational stress measurement by introducing mature scales from abroad and trying to develop scales, but it also faces certain problems.The research of this paper is divided into two parts: (1) Develop the structure and items for the draft scale based on the literature review of occupational stress-related theories and major assessment instruments, in-depth interview with various employees, and expert evaluation. 635 employees are selected through online questionnaires as the research objects. Sample 1 (N = 295) is used for the pre-test of the initial scale, and sample 2 (N = 340) is used for the formal scale measurement and will be effective. The sample data is used for reliability and validity test and analysis. (2) 427 employees are selected through online questionnaires to conduct self-evaluation measures of occupational stress, depression, dysexecutive, and mindfulness traits, and explore the comparison of occupational stress score differences under demographic characteristics, and the effect of occupational stress on mental health, and find the moderating effect of mindfulness on occupational stress and mental health.The results of the study are as follows:(1) Research 1: The occupational stressors scale can comprehensively assess the occupational stress level of China’s employees, which is in line with the actual situation. The scale is based on a three-factor structure of Demands and Ability & Control (DAC), Efforts and Rewards (ER), and Organizational Climate (OC). The results of internal consistency test, confirmatory factor analysis, and test-retest reliability test indicate that the scale has good reliability and validity and can be applied in occupational stress measurement under the background of the new economic era.(2) Study 2: There are significant differences in the scores of different genders in the pay and return dimensions, and women score higher than men; people of different ages have significant differences in the total scores of pay and return, organizational climate, and occupational stress, 26 The occupational stress of the ~35-year-old population is higher than that of other age groups; people with different marital status have significant differences in the total score of contribution and return, organizational atmosphere and occupational stress. The married population is significantly higher than the unmarried population in terms of contribution and return. ; There are significant differences in the total scores of occupational stress and scores in all dimensions of people with different education levels. The scores of people with undergraduate education in the pay and return dimensions are higher than those with other academic backgrounds. People with graduate education and above face more pressure from requirements, ability and autonomy. Large; people with different monthly incomes and job levels have significant differences in the scores of the pay and return dimensions. The higher the monthly income and the higher the job level, the lower the pressure caused by the imbalance of pay and return.There are significant differences in the scores of depression, executive dysfunction, and mindfulness among different genders. Women generally have higher scores on mental health issues than men. Women have higher scores on mindfulness-perception than men, while men score higher on the mindfulness-acceptance dimension. For women.Occupational stress and mental health (depression, executive dysfunction) showed significantly positive correlation. Occupational stress and each dimensions showed a good predictive effect on mental health problems. The acceptance of mindfulness has a significant moderating effect on occupational stress and executive dysfunction.
关键词职业压力 量表编制 抑郁 执行功能 特质正念
学位类型继续教育硕士
语种中文
学位名称理学硕士
学位专业应用心理学
学位授予单位中国科学院大学
学位授予地点中国科学院心理研究所
文献类型学位论文
条目标识符http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/45225
专题健康与遗传心理学研究室
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
王君. 职业压力源量表的编制及初步应用[D]. 中国科学院心理研究所. 中国科学院大学,2021.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 文献类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
王君-硕士学位论文.pdf(1610KB)学位论文 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA请求全文
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[王君]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[王君]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[王君]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。