中国科学院心理研究所机构知识库

目的考察集体主义和个体主义价值取向量表（COLINDEX）的因素结构及修订的价值观量表的信、效度；研究中学生价值观发展的特点、影响因素。方法应用修订的价值观量表对5875名中学生进行问卷调查，进行了信、效度分析及其他统计分析。结果验证性因素分析结果表明COLINDEX量表的两因素模型不能拟合数据，三因素模型拟合指数达到标准；修订的价值观量表经过探索性因素分析可以提取四个因素，量表构想效度良好，分量表和总量表信度指标合格（责任权利、刺激变化、公共安全和传统和谐四个分量表的信度分别是0．84，0．76，0．84和0．74，总量表信度为0．90）；中学生在责任权利、刺激变化、公共安全和传统和谐四个因素上的平均分依次为4．15，3．60，4．18和3．91；以修订的价值观量表的各分量表得分为因变量进行多元方差分析，结果表明性别和年级不存在交互作用，各自的主效应显著。结论我国中学生价值观体系中，集体主义、个体主义两个维度不是互相独立的；修订的价值观量表信度、效度合格，可供进一步研究使用；中学生对集体主义价值观认同程度较高，同时也很重视个性自由；不同性别、年级学生的价值观存在显著差异。

Objective To explore the construct validity of collectivism and individualism scale （COLINDEX） and the reliability and construct validity of its Chinese revision; and to study the development of middle school students＇ value. Methods The revised scale was used and 5875 middle school students were tested. Results Two-factor model of COLENDEX was not substantiated by data, while three factors were abstracted by EFA and confirmed subsequently by CFA. Four factors were abstracted from the Chinese revision of COLINDEX, and four-factor model was confirmed. The Cronbach＇ s alpha coefficients of the total scale （0.90） and ibur sub-scales （0.84,0.76,0.84 and 0.74）were all significantly high. MANOVA was performed to detect gender and grade differences of means in the four dimensions of the revised scale. The main effects of gender and grade reached the significant level; however, interaction between them did not. Conclusion Collectivism and individualism, two dimensions of Chinese middle school students＇ value, were not mutually independent. The revised version of COLINDEX was qualified to be used in further research. The grades on collectivistic items of middle school students were higher than those on individualistic items.

国家自然科学基金(30470582)